-
Let be an infinite set.
(a) Could be countable?
(b) Given any two subsets of , and , define if and only if is a countable subset of . Prove that is an equivalence relation on .
Solution:
(a) No. By Cantor’s theorem, .
(b) From PS1: For reflexivity, notice that, is finite countable, thus .
If then, is finite countable, and hence , so we have symmetry.
Suppose that , . First, notice that
Finally,
is a finite countable set, and thus .
-
(a) State the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.
(b) Let be a positive integer. Show that there exist naturals (possibly zero) and such that .
(c) Prove that the least common multiple of two relatively prime numbers and is equal to their product . In symbols, given positive integers and such that , show that . You may not use the stronger result that unless you prove it first.
Solution:
(b) Let . Then must be odd, say for some . The result follows.
(c) With FTA: Since , for every prime , if and only if . In other words, if and only if . Consequently, .
Therefore, by FTA,
With Bézout: Clearly, . By Bézout, there are integers with , so
from where . Hence, they are equal.
- (a) Define what it means for a graph to be connected and what it means for a graph to be a tree. (b) Argue, using a formal proof, that a connected graph with vertices and edges must be a tree.
Solution:
(a) Connected means any two vertices are the endpoints of some path/walk contained the graph. A tree is a connected graph with no cycles.
(b) I will prove by contradiction that a connected graph with at most edges is a tree. By WOP, suppose that is a counterexample with the least positive number of cycles. Removing an edge from any cycle produces a graph with fewer cycles and edges, so by minimality it must either be a tree or be disconnected. But removing an edge from a cycle cannot disconnect the graph (a short justification is sufficient) and every tree has exactly edges (students can assume this, but having a proof is nice); a contradiction.
- Let be subsets of . Prove or disprove each of the following. (a) . True. (b) . True. (c) If is a closed set, then . False.
- Prove that out of any five lattice points, there are two whose midpoint is also a lattice point. In symbols, let be any five distinct lattice points on the plane. Argue that there exist such that .
Solution:
By the pigeonhole principle, out of the five integers , three must have the same parity. The sum of any two of these three is even. The same for . Again by the pigeonhole, two out of these three two have -coordinates with the same parity. These two points are such that their midpoint is an integer lattice point.
In symbols, the function such that must have a fiber of size 3 or more, that is for . Without loss of generality, suppose that have the same parity. Now define given by . By the pigeonhole principle, is not injective, thus say . But this means that is even and that is even, in other words, .